Perhaps Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks don’t carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of those two tales of violence happened in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video websites that are streaming where viewers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off steam, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but perhaps not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. When working with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to relax and play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete great deal of cash. He is a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, this really is one worker who keeps his very own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a really man that is quiet. He just strolled in very calmly having an axe and smashed all the devices. There were a few customers by them during the time and additionally they were terrified,’ he added.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of these two tales is a bit more frightening, since the axe was wielded perhaps not at the slots, but at a person in the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with a few money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he didn’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm regarding the night of the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant because of the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of cash,’ while the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the regional public for information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up on the scene.
Whose Casino Can It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst every of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight throughout the casino slated to be located royal casino vegas in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one such proposition that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate choice is pertaining to the theory that neighboring communities would be afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have to be able to vote on whether those casinos should really be opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, is one of the handful of prospects who have suggested that all of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that could be positioned in East Boston, for instance.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it would have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal ended up being voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley said throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and social burdens but get none of the proposed advantages.’
According to the state laws that produced the opportunity for three new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate compensation, with arbitration required if the casinos and neighborhood governments can’t arrived at an answer by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that isn’t really outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while nevertheless granting East Boston veto power within the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley hasn’t specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal, a Boston Globe survey discovered that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question had been in support of it, with only two coming down against it (with Conley and an added candidate not answering the question). Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the whole city to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% had been and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by the state because the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is a competing proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing star of great britain’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the recreations book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired leading recreations betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering store critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.
Since Gala Coral Group is one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the area roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘I understand there is certainly huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily filling up with betting shops and payday loan businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very uncommon for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
Nonetheless, fighting back in the corner regarding the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna claimed that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a personal capacity, and was accepted in accordance because of the guidelines and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working office of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for company, as well as for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is not any longer mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group implies that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a totally innocent contribution or not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party may just be looking to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking such a difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he truly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ claimed Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be described as a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this present year their workplace had been accused of editing his Wikipedia page to exhibit evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.